NOT many know that there is a new Act of Parliament in place, known
as the Tobacco Control Act. Recently passed by the Seventh National
Assembly and signed into law a few months ago, the Act seeks to bring
order into the manufacture, promotion and distribution of tobacco
products in Nigeria.
The reason is simple: Tobacco has long been found to have dangerous
public health implications. For instance, while smoking may be legal,
such that an adult may choose to smoke and damn its consequences,
cigarette smoke can potentially also affect non-smokers.
The government has an obligation to its citizens to protect public
health, ensuring that access to potentially dangerous products like
tobacco by the under-aged for instance is outlawed and that innocent
non-smokers are not subjected against their will to passive smoking and
its after-effects, among others.
The Tobacco Act is by many accounts, now a much stronger piece of
legislation than its predecessor.
Stakeholders including legislators and
health sector workers are unanimous in the view that it will, to a
large extent, control the production, promotion and distribution of
tobacco products across the country and in the process help to safeguard
the lives of Nigerians.
Having been passed into law, the Tobacco Control Act is currently
being gazetted into the country’s statutes by the Supreme Court. It is
shocking that while the Tobacco Control Act has attained this degree of
progress, to the commendation of several anti-tobacco NGOs, a certain
manufacturer of tobacco products with a manufacturing factory somewhere
in Senegal, has been granted a licence to import tobacco products into
Nigeria, by the Standards Organisation of Nigeria.
Using the platform of the ECOWAS, Trade Liberalisation Scheme, which
avails members the prerogative to export their products within the West
Africa sub-region, the tobacco manufacturer will in due course import
cigarettes and other finished products to Nigeria.
At face value, the issuance of this import licence may appear
laudable, one aimed at promoting trade and commerce within the West
African sub-region.
On deeper interrogation, however, it raises a number of issues, all
of which further question the rationale or motive behind the action. For
instance, whereas the Tobacco Control Act clearly stipulates that a
licence to import tobacco products may only be granted by the Federal
Minister of Health, it would appear that perhaps taking advantage of the
absence of ministers, the Standards Organisation of Nigeria may have
gone ahead to issue the licence itself.
If as reports indicate this is true, then SON would have acted in
clear contravention of the new Act, and mortgaged the lives of
Nigerians, by literally opening Nigeria’s borders to the influx of
tobacco products, especially at a time when the country is still
grappling with a suffusion of internally produced tobacco products as
well as smuggled ones.
In fact, not long ago, SON itself advertised the presence of several
non-registered foreign brands of cigarettes that are to be found on the
shelves of retailers across the country, warning that these cigarettes
are dangerous.
In stipulating that “no person shall manufacture, import or
distribute tobacco products except the person has obtained a licence or
is authorised in writing to do so by the Minister,” the Tobacco Control
Act obviously seeks to put a systematic leash on the influx of tobacco
products in the country, in so doing, making the availability of
cigarettes far more restricted and controlled than it currently is as
one way of managing the public health challenge of tobacco.
Granting a licence to any importer of cigarettes in the face of this
clear regulation, therefore, raises a number of questions, chief among
which is what is the motivation of the officials of the Standards
Organisation of Nigeria who have granted this manufacturer a licence? Is
the Standards Organisation of Nigeria ignorant of the Tobacco Control
Act? Has its action been predicated on a need to enhance its coffers by
the massive licence fees and charges which it will obviously slam on the
importer on an annual basis? Or is there a motivation for personal
enrichment by the officials concerned? Tobacco is renowned globally as
big money business.
Are there mouth-watering counterpart underhand deals as an
accompaniment to this hurriedly awarded licence to import cigarettes?
The recent licence awarded by the Standards Organisation of Nigeria, if
true indeed raises yet another issue, it brings to light the question of
lack of congruence and disharmony in Nigeria’s policy making space.
For instance, the Central Bank of Nigeria only a few weeks ago issued
regulatory guidelines that seek to conserve our foreign exchange regime
through strategic restriction of the importation of spurious items.
Items like toothpicks, plantain chips, wooden doors and others were
placed under this systematic restriction in a manner that makes it
easier for the legendary camel to pass the eye of the needle than for
them to be legally imported.
Why issue a licence to anyone to import cigarettes when the country
is strategically restricting the importation of non-essential and
spurious items, anyway? It raises the question of whether or not
Nigeria’s regulatory agencies bother to talk to themselves and
understand the rationale behind various government policies.
The happenings regarding this reported issuance of a licence to a
tobacco manufacturer to import cigarettes and other tobacco products to
Nigeria in contravention of the Tobacco Control Act, should pique the
interest of all Nigerians and very importantly, President Buhari who in
the last few months has embarked on a painstaking mission to return
Nigeria to a culture of doing things right.
It would be a disservice to all Nigerians if Standards Organisation
of Nigeria were to pull the hands of the clock back in an attempt to
return Nigeria to an era which it is struggling to shake off.
To make matters worse, it would be an even greater disservice to
Nigeria, if its platform for doing this is the importation of cigarettes
and tobacco products which have been proven to be dangerous to the
health of smokers and non-smokers alike and which, therefore, ought to
be rigorously controlled.
• Njideka Obi (Ms), is of the Centre for the
Promotion of Enterprise and Business Best Practice, Wuse 2, Abuja, FCT
Thursday, 10 September 2015
Impunity as maiden test of tobacco law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment